The final ending of slavery in 1838 marked a radical break in the agrarian
history of the Cape Colony. The liberated slaves could and did make use of
the mobility that emancipation allowed them. This amounted to a real
negotiation of the price of labour, for at various points in the nineteenth
century the price of labour threatened the very profitability of farming. For
the greater part of the century many landlords were led, in the words of one
colonial official, ‘to look back…with something very like an envious eye, to
the days in which slavery was tolerated by law, because then the slaveholder
could command labour whenever it was needed.’
For the former slaveowners, the outcome was agricultural innovation and
routine insolvency, and merchants came to have an increasingly important
role in the rural political economy. But post-emancipation agrarian structures
were not merely shaped by the incursion of merchant capital and the
mobility of labour. The former slaveholders displayed a remarkable tenacity.
Most significantly, Cape landlords were heirs to a carefully constructed
political economy in which the rules governing the circulation of land and
wealth were clearly defined in community and familial terms and in which
the ties of credit ran both vertically and horizontally. This was a ‘moral
community’ in which all were cushioned against the sometimes detrimental
effects of participation in a market economy. It is for this reason that the
intervention of English-speaking merchants, by not paying due regard to
these rules, was of a qualitatively different kind. Community, in short,
provides the backdrop against which much of the colony's agrarian history
was played out.
This article seeks to provide a rather different interpretation of the post-emancipation Western Cape than is at present on offer.